(Blog editor's note: I had hoped to use image from
https://www.google.com/search?q=monty+python+images+cartoon&client=firefox-b-d&sxsrf=ALeKk03m1sRSVSf5c2RGYsSktQQweaFQcA:1604485804151&tbm=isch&source=iu&ictx=1&fir=j_aAUkR25RqvyM%252CNJFoqwtJ-XavBM%252C_&vet=1&usg=AI4_-kTlvMYIPkpalIaRLfwl2DdU-AMmWQ&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjx8Jyz1-jsAhUTHcAKHfcOA_IQ9QF6BAgKECs#imgrc=j_aAUkR25RqvyM
here with caption: "Universal Credit: quasi- or virtual police state," but Blogger is not allowing me to do so. Sorry.)
A Universal Credit claimant has written me in response to the below and yet-to-be-published-in-print letter to Hereford Times:
Subject: Thousands will see five big changes to Universal Credit in November - check now - Birmingham Live
https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/big-changes-universal-credit-november-19196317
In
reference to the last letter you posted it should be noted that this
month sees changes in UC payments that will benefit those also eligible
for PIP, finally stop the punitive reductions for those who are paid
weekly or fortnightly and recognises the problems in transitioning from
various legacy benefits by (small) financial awards...
Although
the article is just over 24 hours old it also seems that Sunak has also
now agreed to extend the Covid-19 payment of an extra £90pcm as part of
the revised furlough scheme.
As you are aware,
as a UC claimant subject to the Benefit Cap due to my rent being fixed
just under the pre-2015 LHA/HB maximum I do not receive any extra monies
from the DWP at this time.
Nor do I get any
leeway... unlike other renters in my halfway house who are in receipt of
legacy benefits and have had no contact or demands from the DWP since
last February I am still required to undergo mandatory, sanctionable,
telephone or face-to-face interviews to explain my job searches and
failure to gain employment.
Quite why my mental
health or wellbeing differs from those in almost identical
circumstances but on older forms of benefits has yet to be explained.
Subject: Re: Talking Point by Dr Jonathan Godfrey, and MPs explain opposition to Rashford's meal plan
Noting a Resolution Foundation report suggesting that "unemployment
among 18 to 29-year-olds could hit 17% by late 2020, and ... the mental
health risks linked to lockdown and economic insecurity," Dr Jonathan
Godfrey also notes:
"The proportion of adults experiencing poor
mental health has increased by 80% among 18 to 29-year-olds compared
with a year ago, the biggest increase of any age group." (Talking Point,
Oct. 29, 2020, p68)
One 23 year-old apparently not experiencing
poor mental health is Marcus Rashford (born 31 Oct. 1997), raised in a
very public spirited environment for a life outside football as well as
MUFC stardom. Speaking of one of his recent plaudits, Rashford said that
he "had a voice and a platform that could be used to at least ask the
questions."(1)
That contrasts heavily with how Universal Credit
(UC) claimants are treated. UC’s ‘Claimant Commitment’ and ‘digital by
default’ infrastructure micro-manage the lives of claimants and UC
functionaries.(2) That makes mutual recognition of a shared humanity
extremely difficult: the Department for Work & Pensions (DWP)
mindset is that the claimant’s low income and not low wages is ‘the
problem’. More UC claimants are penalised in the UK and more severely
than by Magistrates’ and Sheriff’s courts, with loss of benefit
extending to years of what I’d call debt slavery and Law Professor Dr
David Webster refers to as ‘Benefit Sanctions: Britain’s secret penal
system’.(3)
Then along comes Covid-19 lockdown and greater
universality of low income. Tory Government responds by increasing
Universal Credit levels but not the levels of the benefits it is
designed to replace.(4)
Against this backdrop and Rashford’s
campaign to extend free school meals eleigibility to school holidays,
Hereford & South Herefordshire MP and First Secretary to the
Treasury Jesse Norman says he “has nothing but respect for Marcus
Rashord, both as a footballer and as a campaigner. But it is really
important to look beyond the headlines.” (Hereford Times, Oct. 29, 2020,
p5)
Yes, indeed it is vital to look beyond the headlines,
especially those generated by government press releases, and to consider
the differences in ‘authority’ between an Old Etonian MP and a top
sportsman who delivered food parcels as a youngster!
Alan Raymond Wheatley, BA Interdisciplinary Studies (Major: Sociology)
(Postal Address and telephone number submitted, too)
Note
1.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marcus_Rashford#Recognition 2.
https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&ei=5hOgX7rYGqTaxgODoqrgCQ&q=%22universal+credit%22+micro-manage&oq=%22universal+credit%22+micro-manage&gs_lcp=CgZwc3ktYWIQA1CNgwNYjYMDYKCZA2gAcAB4AIABR4gBhQGSAQEymAEAoAEBqgEHZ3dzLXdpesABAQ&sclient=psy-ab&ved=0ahUKEwi645u9heTsAhUkrXEKHQORCpwQ4dUDCAw&uact=5 3.
https://www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/resources/benefit-sanctions-britains-secret-penal-system 4.
https://www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2020/september/dwp-response-coronavirus-inquiry-inadequate-says-work-and-pension-committee