Disability News Service photo illustrating police handling of disabled anti-fracking protestors |
Blogger Alan notes: My use of the above photo might be argued by some as unduly provocative, but I would argue that there are some in authority who do not want Parliament to debate the policing of anti-fracking demonstrations that Tina Louise Rothery's petition to UK Parliament is about.
I’ve made a petition – will you sign it?
Click this link to sign the petition:
https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/279233/sponsors/new?token=X4Mblz31gEDekc0E0HZS
My petition:
Revoke charges/fines/outstanding cases against anti-fracking protest & apologise
For nearly a decade residents throughout UK campaigned against fracking. The government promoted, encouraged, financed & marketed a 'Dash for Gas' based on inadequate research that meant our communities were vulnerable to harm. Used as guinea pigs, then treated as criminals when we objected.
Hundreds of arrests, fines, records & outstanding court cases MUST BE OVERTURNED; our bodies were harmed by police during peaceful protest; arrests, fines, jail time & criminal records followed.
We want an apology for anguish, suffering & time stolen from people who simply wanted to protect their families. Government has now admitted we were right - they cannot safely frack for shale gas without risking uncontrollable/unpredictable seismic activity. We are not and never have been criminals.
And so I, Alan, clicked on that link, and present the response I received from UK Parliament Petitions that greeted me:
It reads:
PetitionsWho will police the police and those who use such stalling tactics against the restoration of justice?
UK Government and ParliamentWe’re checking this petition
5 people have already supported Tina Louise Rothery’s petition.
We need to check it meets the petition standards before we publish it.
Please try again in a few days.
What do you think?
See also https://newsforwardsfromalanwheatley.blogspot.com/2019/11/law-and-order-abusing-disadvantaged-minorities.html
the petition link is broken, so I guess that parliament has decided it is not valid?
ReplyDeleteQuite probably. Anyhow, I've at least alerted folk that such a petition was attempted. Perhaps it lacked contextual information?
ReplyDelete